Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Jun 15, 2024 11:51 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 13 posts ] 
 ATF Agents Burst Into Wrong House ( a BLOCK off!) 
Author Message
 Post subject: ATF Agents Burst Into Wrong House ( a BLOCK off!)
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:10 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
http://www.nbc6.net/news/15843682/detail.html

Quote:
ATF Agents Burst Into Wrong House
Mother, Toddler Inside Home When Officers Enter

POSTED: 9:15 am EDT April 10, 2008
UPDATED: 10:19 pm EDT April 10, 2008

MIAMI --
Officers from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives barged into a South Florida home Wednesday only to discover they had the wrong address.

The ATF agents were supposed to conduct a raid at a home in the 2600 block of Northwest 49th Terrace in northwest Miami-Dade County, but they were off by one block. They entered a house on Northwest 49th Street instead.

Philomaine Silvain and her 3-year-old son were among the innocent people inside the home when the agents came in.

Silvain pointed out damage to her front door.

"The door's right here," Silvain said. "There's a hole right here. It's broken."

Her back window was also broken from where federal agents fired canisters into the apartment at about 11:30 p.m. Wednesday.

The agents left the tear gas cans in the house, and Silvain kicked them out and into the street before dumping them into the garbage.

No one from the ATF would speak to NBC 6 on camera, but a representative said over the phone that it was an innocent mistake, agents apologized on the scene and ATF would repair any damages.

Silvain's door has already been fixed. However, she said she plans on speaking with a lawyer.

The officers did arrest the man they actually were looking for one street away.

_________________
Certified Carry Permit Instructor (MNTactics.com and ShootingSafely.com)
Click here for current Carry Classes
"There is no safety for honest men, except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edwin Burke


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:27 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
Ok, if an officer on the street were to just randomly spray someone with OC, wouldn't that be criminal assault regardless of the badge?

Couldn't a good lawyer argue the same for the use of tear gas in this case?

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:36 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 116
Location: Korea
mrokern wrote:
Ok, if an officer on the street were to just randomly spray someone with OC, wouldn't that be criminal assault regardless of the badge?

Couldn't a good lawyer argue the same for the use of tear gas in this case?

-Mark


Different situations, that's a personal contact, not serving a warrant.

In all honesty, they screwed up. They've owned partially up to it. I think they need to do more, and there is no reason why they couldn't put out a statement saying "Whoops, we're not perfect, we messed up, we will pay for damages and clean the house etc..." The ATF should have left an agent or two there to watch over the property and clean it up (aka remove the canisters)

(And then they need to go invest in a few Garmin GPS units...)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:39 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
mrokern wrote:
Ok, if an officer on the street were to just randomly spray someone with OC, wouldn't that be criminal assault regardless of the badge?


Well, yeah, but if he was trying to spray a criminal and got some on you, it would be an accident. To carry the metaphor further, this is more akin to him grabbing someone he thinks is a criminal and spraying him. A case of mistaken identity.

But really, to get to the heart of the matter, these raids are in theory planned in advance. A cop on the street is very reactionary. The BATman raids are proactive.

I tend to think the BATmen like playing Jack Bauer too much. They like to get intel updated second by second over the cell phone from some guy in a dark room back at CTC.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:57 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
DeanC wrote:
mrokern wrote:
Ok, if an officer on the street were to just randomly spray someone with OC, wouldn't that be criminal assault regardless of the badge?


Well, yeah, but if he was trying to spray a criminal and got some on you, it would be an accident. To carry the metaphor further, this is more akin to him grabbing someone he thinks is a criminal and spraying him. A case of mistaken identity.

But really, to get to the heart of the matter, these raids are in theory planned in advance. A cop on the street is very reactionary. The BATman raids are proactive.

I tend to think the BATmen like playing Jack Bauer too much. They like to get intel updated second by second over the cell phone from some guy in a dark room back at CTC.


Time for legislators to create the LEO version of malpractice suits.

I'm actually very pro-law enforcement. I'm also very concerned that too many of our CIVILIAN law enforcement agencies are becoming all too military in nature.

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:28 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:04 pm
Posts: 1682
Location: Wright County
mrokern wrote:
Time for legislators to create the LEO version of malpractice suits.

I'm actually very pro-law enforcement. I'm also very concerned that too many of our CIVILIAN law enforcement agencies are becoming all too military in nature.

-Mark


Well said, I don't think I could agree with you more Mark. Maybe the best solution would be to follow Dr. Pauls route of advice and get rid of the BATF?

_________________
Get Off My Lawn.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:51 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
mrokern wrote:
Time for legislators to create the LEO version of malpractice suits.


Sure, and how do you suppose they will fund the either the malpractice insurance premiums and/or the malpractice pool?

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:32 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 1743
Location: Lakeville
DeanC wrote:
Sure, and how do you suppose they will fund the either the malpractice insurance premiums and/or the malpractice pool?

Simple, just limit lawsuits to actual damages.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:53 pm 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
SultanOfBrunei wrote:
Simple, just limit lawsuits to actual damages.


Won't work. Provides too little incentive for the citizen and her lawyer to go through all the inconvenience and hassle of suing the BATF.

This would work, though.
1. Full actual damages,
2. Civil penalty in all cases of $100,000 payable to the plaintiff, AND
3. Complete reimbursement for all costs of the litigation
including attorneys' fees.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:22 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
DeanC wrote:
mrokern wrote:
Time for legislators to create the LEO version of malpractice suits.


Sure, and how do you suppose they will fund the either the malpractice insurance premiums and/or the malpractice pool?


Ooo, ooo, I know this one....

Tax hikes?

Good point.

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:12 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:02 pm
Posts: 571
EricMN wrote:
In all honesty, they screwed up. They've owned partially up to it. I think they need to do more, and there is no reason why they couldn't put out a statement saying "Whoops, we're not perfect, we messed up, we will pay for damages and clean the house etc..."

But they've hit the incorrect house before, therefore according to their own standards this mistake was <B><I>willful</i></b> and therefore worthy of criminal prosecution.

Just ask Ryan Horsley of Red's Trading Post in Idaho, or any of the other hundreds of dealers they've driven out of business for the heinous crime of putting 'Y' or 'N' on a form instead of writing out 'Yes' or 'No'.

_________________
If the Government does not obey the Constitution, then what is Treason? -- Unknown


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:54 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 1743
Location: Lakeville
kimberman wrote:
1. Full actual damages,
2. Civil penalty in all cases of $100,000 payable to the plaintiff, AND
3. Complete reimbursement for all costs of the litigation including attorneys' fees.


You're far too generous! :P


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:13 pm 
On time out
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:18 pm
Posts: 1689
Location: 35 W and Hiway 10
That all works, but really its just us as tax payers paying back us. What will work is Them paying US.

I have said this before. Individual awards are taken from the retirement funds and pay of the individual. dept wide awards come from operations budget. That means no OT, no raises, and maybe paycuts.

THIS and only this hits the guys doing the dumb stuff where it hurts, and it will help break down the blue wall, by costing honest cops money and making them resent the dumb and crooked ones, hopefully resulting in the good ones culling out the bad ones.

I have sat and listened to Minnesota Cops laugh at pay outs, the phrase "thats a tax hike" was frequently repeated when talking about beat downs and mistakes.

_________________
molan labe


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 13 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group