Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Jun 15, 2024 11:28 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 4 posts ] 
 Ex-Boston police officer sentenced to 18 years in drug case 
Author Message
 Post subject: Ex-Boston police officer sentenced to 18 years in drug case
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:53 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 3:02 am
Posts: 816
Location: South of the River Suburbs
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/region ... 8&srvc=rss

Quote:
Ex-Boston police officer sentenced to 18 years in drug case
By Associated Press
Monday, March 10, 2008

A federal judge has sentenced a former Boston police officer to 18 years in prison for protecting a cocaine shipment for FBI agents posing as drug dealers.

Nelson Carrasquillo was jailed today, nearly three months after the first of two colleagues was sentenced to a 13-year prison term for conspiring to protect what they believed was 100 kilograms of cocaine.

The three policemen were arrested in 2006 after they went to Miami to collect $36,000 from people they thought were drug dealers.

They had been hired to escort a truck they believed was carrying cocaine.

All three pleaded guilty.

U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan says the 36-year-old Carrasquillo provided counter-surveillance services, monitored Boston Police radio communication and helped guide a drug shipment.


Funny, but here in Minnesota, using a scanner or a radio capable of monitoring police communications during commission of a crime is a felony. At least for us "civilians". Maybe that law doesn't apply to cops. Right?

Aww, shoot, he must have had a compelling reason to do so.

Oh well.

_________________
My YouTube Videos

"We're either gonna be the best of friends or there's gonna be a whole lotta shootin' goin' on."

"I think it's a good thing for serving cops to mix with non-cops in a situation where they understand that they aren't in charge." -JoelR

"You'd be amazed at the things a bullet can stop." -Old Irish Proverb


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:22 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
Well, he did get 18 years. Sounds like a felony conviction to me... :?

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:03 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 3:02 am
Posts: 816
Location: South of the River Suburbs
Good point.

I guess I lost sight of the fact that he was convicted in the light of what he'd done.

It is good to see the system work when it catches the bad guys.

_________________
My YouTube Videos

"We're either gonna be the best of friends or there's gonna be a whole lotta shootin' goin' on."

"I think it's a good thing for serving cops to mix with non-cops in a situation where they understand that they aren't in charge." -JoelR

"You'd be amazed at the things a bullet can stop." -Old Irish Proverb


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:24 am 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
Binky .357 wrote:
Good point.

I guess I lost sight of the fact that he was convicted in the light of what he'd done.

It is good to see the system work when it catches the bad guys.
Yup. There's far too many cases of cops committing crimes when they don't get convicted.

And, honest, some of that is unavoidable, and entirely proper: when the state hauls anybody into court, whether it's Martin Luther King on one hand, or Ernesto Miranda, Jeffrey Dahmer or Landen Beard on the other, that guy is entitled to a vigorous, competent defense, and the state must prove every element of the charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

If the state fails, the accused should walk.

In the Ramsey County deputies case, if the "it was a prank, pinky swear" defense persuades the jurors that there's reasonable doubt about the thievery, the two should walk.

That's fine.

What bothers me is how often things that should get that far are swept under the rug.

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 4 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group